Comments on: Review – The Nokia Windows Mobile Smartphone Range https://www.mobileinquirer.com/2011/review-the-nokia-windows-mobile-smartphone-range/ Smartphone, Tablet and Technology News and Reviews Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:02:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3 By: SusyJen https://www.mobileinquirer.com/2011/review-the-nokia-windows-mobile-smartphone-range/#comment-532 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:02:00 +0000 http://www.mobileinquirer.com/?p=679#comment-532 Hi, @55c2e58b9fc28299793717978c3b08fe:disqus  i fully get the article and think it was very well written, thanks.

]]>
By: Anthony Munns https://www.mobileinquirer.com/2011/review-the-nokia-windows-mobile-smartphone-range/#comment-168 Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:57:53 +0000 http://www.mobileinquirer.com/?p=679#comment-168 In reply to Tropolite.

Hi, Troy. I see your point but I am afraid I was not getting confused, but the title of the article may have lead a reader to think that. I was not in any way getting confused with Windows Mobile and Windows 7, surely the article reflects that, I was however simply pointing out that Nokia and Windows had entered the “mobile” market.

]]>
By: Tropolite https://www.mobileinquirer.com/2011/review-the-nokia-windows-mobile-smartphone-range/#comment-163 Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:53:56 +0000 http://www.mobileinquirer.com/?p=679#comment-163 It’s interesting seeing an attempt at being unbiased when writing an article.

But, even the title of the article shows the ignorance to the OS or the builds, and coming from an uneducated position.

Windows Mobile is Dead and Gone: simple.

Windows Phone is not to be confused by the Microsoft’s initial jaunt to mobile technology. Windows Phone 7 is built from scratch. It is not a rebuild of Windows Mobile.

Try it, use it and you will see that it cannot be confused as such.

]]>